ຄວາມຜິດພາດທົ່ວໄປທີ່ບໍ່ຫນ້າເຊື່ອນີ້ສາມາດເຮັດໃຫ້ທ່ານເສຍເງິນ 7%+ ເງິນປັນຜົນ

When it comes to closed-end funds (or ໃດ investment, for that matter), it pays to look for things most people misunderstand. Because these (seemingly) tiny investor oversights and errors can give us keen-eyed contrarians our best buying opportunities.

And when it comes to CEFs, there’s one all-too-common mistake I see folks make time and time again, particularly those who are new to these high-yielding funds. To see what I’m getting at, let’s zero in on a CEF called the Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK).

STK’s portfolio mainly consists of large-cap tech stocks: Apple (AAPL), ຜູ້ຜະລິດຊິບ Broadcom (AVGO) ແລະ Microsoft (MSFT) are among its top holdings. The fund boasts a dividend just shy of 7% today.

As you can see in the chart above, it’s returned hundreds of percent since inception nearly 14 years ago. If we average this out to its CAGR (compound annualized growth rate, or simply the average percent return per year), we see that the fund has delivered an incredible 20% per year on average.

Here’s the thing, though—most people have no idea of STK’s incredible performance! Dial it up on a free stock-screening tool like Google Finance and you get this chart, showing a meager 35% return in nearly a decade and a half!

ທີ່ຂອງຂ້ອຍ ພາຍໃນ CEF ການບໍລິການ, we don’t use Google Finance or Yahoo Finance because they’re misleading, especially when it comes to CEFs, for a reason I’ll explain in a minute. But most people rely on these free and easy-to-access tools.

Combined, both are more popular than every other financial website by a huge margin. So when users see different results in the charts we use in ພາຍໃນ CEF and those they get from Google and Yahoo, it’s understandable if they’re a bit confused.

So what’s going on here? The simple truth is that Google Finance and Yahoo Finance don’t include dividends when reporting an investment’s historical performance. That’s fine for measuring a non-dividend paying stock like ຕົວອັກສອນ (GOOGL). But these services don’t work ທີ່ທັງຫມົດ for CEFs, which yield 7.9% on average right now.

Professional tools like the ones we use at CEF Insider, however, factor in the return you get both from dividends and price gains to give you a fund’s total return. That’s critical because dividends matter a lot—even the comparatively low yield (around 1.5% currently) on the average S&P 500 stock makes a big difference over time.

So you can imagine that when you’re dealing with a CEF that yields 8% or more, a price-return chart that ignores dividends is ຫຼາຍ misleading. For example, a fund that trades at $10 a share in 2010 and also at $10 a share in 2020 looks like a dud—unless that same fund has yielded 10% that whole time. In that case, it has delivered a strong 10% yearly profit.

This is why, if you look up STK on most free stock-screening sites, it looks like a disaster. But we know the reality is much different, so we can put this one on our watch list knowing it’s got a history of strong performance going for it.

The key takeaway? When analyzing CEFs, be sure you’re looking at the right charts—and that those charts ປະກອບດ້ວຍ dividends in their return calculations. As many of these charts are difficult and expensive for most people to access, your best bet is to let me monitor past performance for you through a subscription to CEF Insider.

Michael Foster ແມ່ນນັກວິເຄາະດ້ານການຄົ້ນຄວ້າ ນຳ ການຄາດຄະເນກົງກັນຂ້າມ. ສຳ ລັບແນວຄວາມຄິດກ່ຽວກັບລາຍໄດ້ທີ່ຍິ່ງໃຫຍ່, ກົດທີ່ນີ້ເພື່ອລາຍງານລ້າສຸດຂອງພວກເຮົາ“ລາຍໄດ້ທີ່ບໍ່ສາມາດທໍາລາຍໄດ້: 5 ກອງທຶນຕໍ່ລອງທີ່ມີເງິນປັນຜົນຄົງທີ່ 10.2%."

ການເປີດເຜີຍ: ບໍ່ມີ